(Note: I capitalized “Evolution” because it would be unfair to capitalize the “Church” and not “evolution”.)
The play Inherit the Wind shows the conservative people of a small town, somewhere in the United States. Their life isn’t exactly exciting and basically consists in going to the church and believing in God; but when Bertram Cates, a young science teacher, starts teaching Darwin’s theory of Evolution to his students, the whole town gets out of its lethargy and protests against this “aberration”. The play, which is mostly about Cate’s trial, is a plea for freedom of thought. Many facts show it, the most important of which is Henry Drummond defending Cate’s right to believe in Evolution, but also Brady’s right to believe in the Bible.
During the play, Drummond is constantly pleading for the liberty of thought, speech and expression. For example, at the beginning of the trial, people are shocked to hear him swear, but he says that words are there to be used and he refuses to stop swearing. Then, his main arguments to defend Bert Cates are always about him having the right to think. Once in the play, he even asks Matthew Brady: “Can sponges think, Mister Brady?” Confused, Brady says that if God gave the sponges the capacity to think, of course they can; and Drummond carries on saying: “Mister Cates is asking for the same rights as a sponge! He wants the right to think!” Unfortunately, his message is not clearly understood by the audience. Later, the lawyer goes further and defends Darwin’s right to think and write about Evolution. He says that the scientist had the right to write On the Origin of Species, and that whoever wants to read it should have the right to read it and to talk about it. In short, he thinks that the Church shouldn’t condemn people for thinking freely and seeking concrete answers to their questions.
At the end of Inherit the Wind, Drummond surprises the public by defending Brady’s right to be a Creationist and to defend the “literal truth” of the Bible. It is obvious that he is in favour of the theory of Evolution – he says it himself many times – but the most important value for him is freedom. Therefore, even if he ridicules Brady’s blind belief in the Bible with his sarcastic remarks, he still respects his opponent’s choice to believe that the Earth and all the species living on it were created by God and that a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree... After Brady dies, Drummond insists that he was indeed a good-hearted man. When Hornbeck, the journalist, criticizes Brady and the townspeople’s point of view and says that they are simple-minded and ridiculous, the lawyer defends them as well as he defended Cates. Finally, Henry Drummond himself is a symbol: he represents freedom of thought.
In conclusion, it is obvious that freedom of thought – along with freedom of speech and freedom of expression – is the main theme of the play. Henry Drummond’s role in the story is clearly to tell the public that whatever their beliefs are, they must respect other people’s beliefs as well. The play encourages the people to fight for their ideas, but also to be open-minded and to fight to let the others express their own ideas. Voltaire, a French writer of the 18th century, once said something that represents very well the main message of Inherit the Wind: “Je ne suis pas d’accord avec ce que vous dites, mais je me battrai jusqu’à la mort pour que vous ayez le droit de le dire.”
(590 words)
Friday, December 11, 2009
Monday, November 23, 2009
LEL 4: Grammar Skills for Writing 4: Adjectives, Adverbs and Confusing Words
1. Interest level
I think this course would be extremely interesting for some anglophonic people who write how they speak and don't know, for example, that the word "alright" doesn't exist. It would also be beneficial to many francophonic people who don't know the difference between "write", "rite" and "right"; "where", "wear" and "were"; "than" and "then"; etc. I thought it was quite interesting even though I already knew it.
2. Difficulty
For people who can make the difference between an adverb and an adjective, and between the words that sound the same, the course is extremely easy. I am one of these people, since I write much better than I speak in English... However, I am sure it can be difficult for people who speak very well but never write.
3. What I learned
Unfortunately, I cannot say I learned anything...
4. My score: 100/100
5. Course rating: 8/10
Even though this course was not interesting for me, I think it is the most relevant course I took so far. I think people don't know how to write; especially when they write posts on sites like Facebook or on blogs. I see mistakes like "your" instead of "you're" way too often. If everyone took a course like this one, maybe people would stop inventing new languages on the Web...
I think this course would be extremely interesting for some anglophonic people who write how they speak and don't know, for example, that the word "alright" doesn't exist. It would also be beneficial to many francophonic people who don't know the difference between "write", "rite" and "right"; "where", "wear" and "were"; "than" and "then"; etc. I thought it was quite interesting even though I already knew it.
2. Difficulty
For people who can make the difference between an adverb and an adjective, and between the words that sound the same, the course is extremely easy. I am one of these people, since I write much better than I speak in English... However, I am sure it can be difficult for people who speak very well but never write.
3. What I learned
Unfortunately, I cannot say I learned anything...
4. My score: 100/100
5. Course rating: 8/10
Even though this course was not interesting for me, I think it is the most relevant course I took so far. I think people don't know how to write; especially when they write posts on sites like Facebook or on blogs. I see mistakes like "your" instead of "you're" way too often. If everyone took a course like this one, maybe people would stop inventing new languages on the Web...
LEL 3: Grammar Skills for Writing 2: Fine-tuning Punctuation
1. Interest level
This course was not really interesting. I thought it would teach how to use punctuation to add interesting effects in a sentence, but it was only about the grammar rules concerning punctuation and the correct use of punctuation in English language.
2. Difficulty
The course is divided in four lessons. Lesson 1 - about colons and semicolons - was very easy, since we saw it in class when we talked about the sentence patterns. Lesson 2 - about apostrophes and dashes - was also very easy, since I learned a long time ago how to use apostrophes in English, and dashes are used the same way as in French. Lesson 3 - about quotation marks - was more tricky, because it was not like in French. Finally, lesson 4 - about hyphens, parentheses, brackets, ellipsis, diagonals and numbers - was not really hard, but it was certainly the most interesting part, because it was more complete.
3. What I learned
I learned where to place the punctuation in quotations in English. In French, we put the commas and the dots after the quotation mark; but in English they have to be placed before. I also learned that brackets have to be used to insert a parenthetical idea in another, instead of a second pair of parenthesis.
4. My score: 95/100
5. Course rating: 7/10
I think the course is relevant enough, but it could be improved by adding a lesson about how to use punctuation to create special effects in a text.
This course was not really interesting. I thought it would teach how to use punctuation to add interesting effects in a sentence, but it was only about the grammar rules concerning punctuation and the correct use of punctuation in English language.
2. Difficulty
The course is divided in four lessons. Lesson 1 - about colons and semicolons - was very easy, since we saw it in class when we talked about the sentence patterns. Lesson 2 - about apostrophes and dashes - was also very easy, since I learned a long time ago how to use apostrophes in English, and dashes are used the same way as in French. Lesson 3 - about quotation marks - was more tricky, because it was not like in French. Finally, lesson 4 - about hyphens, parentheses, brackets, ellipsis, diagonals and numbers - was not really hard, but it was certainly the most interesting part, because it was more complete.
3. What I learned
I learned where to place the punctuation in quotations in English. In French, we put the commas and the dots after the quotation mark; but in English they have to be placed before. I also learned that brackets have to be used to insert a parenthetical idea in another, instead of a second pair of parenthesis.
4. My score: 95/100
5. Course rating: 7/10
I think the course is relevant enough, but it could be improved by adding a lesson about how to use punctuation to create special effects in a text.
Friday, November 20, 2009
11 Sexy Ways to Introduce a Literary Analysis
Background:
- Need a thesis statement (TS)
- Phrase the TS in terms of literary elements
- A TS is an interesting interpretation
- Use "quotations" to support the interpretation
- Don't use "I think"
1. Biographical information (author)
In Occurence at Owl Creek, A. Bierce was a northen soldier, yet he takes a southern point of view to express the horrors or war.
2. Quotation
"I am not mad. No, not me." Why did the narrator say this? Was he really sane? E.A. Poe's The Tell-Tale Heart explores the fine line between madness and sanity from the perspective of the narrator.
3. Definition
According to the dictionary, a lottery is a random draw with money as the prize. In S. Jackson's The Lottery, the prize is very macabre indeed: it's death by stoning.
4. Literary element
Imagery is a powerful way to express feelings and emotions. In Ode on a Grecian Urn, J. Keats personifies an ancient object to show the contrast between eternal beauty and ephemeral beauty.
5. Life experience of an author
E. Hemingway had a lot of problems communicating with women throughout his life. This is reflected in Hills Like White Elephants, where Jig and the American never really communicate.
6. Plot
At the beginning of Oscar Wilde's Nightingale and the Rose, the nightingale's heart is broken by the student's sadness. By the end, her heart is literally broken by a thorn of a rose tree.
7. Philosophical or sociological concept
Tries involving life and death should be based on reason and justice. In F.S.'s The Lady or the Tiger, justice is based on the whims of the king.
8. Historical background
Gothicism was in vogue in the early nineteenth century, delving into metaphysical issues and the meaning of death. In E.A. Poe's The Tell-Tale Heart, there are many gothic elements.
9. Claim to fame and notoriety
J.D. Salinger's Catcher in the Rye was written in the 1950's and is still read in almost every literature course.
10. Interesting imagery
A painting is for the painter what the novel is for the writer.
11. Allusion
Many literary works are related to trials: Karfka's The Trial, Lee's Tokilla, T. Capote's In Cold Blood. These express universal themes. In Lawrence and Lee's Inherit the Wind, the trial explores free thinking US fundamentalism.
- Need a thesis statement (TS)
- Phrase the TS in terms of literary elements
- A TS is an interesting interpretation
- Use "quotations" to support the interpretation
- Don't use "I think"
1. Biographical information (author)
In Occurence at Owl Creek, A. Bierce was a northen soldier, yet he takes a southern point of view to express the horrors or war.
2. Quotation
"I am not mad. No, not me." Why did the narrator say this? Was he really sane? E.A. Poe's The Tell-Tale Heart explores the fine line between madness and sanity from the perspective of the narrator.
3. Definition
According to the dictionary, a lottery is a random draw with money as the prize. In S. Jackson's The Lottery, the prize is very macabre indeed: it's death by stoning.
4. Literary element
Imagery is a powerful way to express feelings and emotions. In Ode on a Grecian Urn, J. Keats personifies an ancient object to show the contrast between eternal beauty and ephemeral beauty.
5. Life experience of an author
E. Hemingway had a lot of problems communicating with women throughout his life. This is reflected in Hills Like White Elephants, where Jig and the American never really communicate.
6. Plot
At the beginning of Oscar Wilde's Nightingale and the Rose, the nightingale's heart is broken by the student's sadness. By the end, her heart is literally broken by a thorn of a rose tree.
7. Philosophical or sociological concept
Tries involving life and death should be based on reason and justice. In F.S.'s The Lady or the Tiger, justice is based on the whims of the king.
8. Historical background
Gothicism was in vogue in the early nineteenth century, delving into metaphysical issues and the meaning of death. In E.A. Poe's The Tell-Tale Heart, there are many gothic elements.
9. Claim to fame and notoriety
J.D. Salinger's Catcher in the Rye was written in the 1950's and is still read in almost every literature course.
10. Interesting imagery
A painting is for the painter what the novel is for the writer.
11. Allusion
Many literary works are related to trials: Karfka's The Trial, Lee's Tokilla, T. Capote's In Cold Blood. These express universal themes. In Lawrence and Lee's Inherit the Wind, the trial explores free thinking US fundamentalism.
Monday, November 16, 2009
Book Report - Pride and Prejudice
Through the years, many novels have marked the history of English litterature; Pride and Prejudice, by Jane Austen, is certainly one of them. This famous novel is among the greatest classics of literature for it is highly apreciated for its wit, the social criticism it contains and its engaging characters. All these elements, and many others, contribute to the originality of both the story and the style of the writing. In this report, I am going to explain how the point of view and the characters make Pride and Prejudice a good novel.
First, it is important to mention the particular point of view. In any novel of this kind, the main character would, without any doubt, have been Jane, Elizabeth's older sister. The most classical love story between her and Mr. Bingley would have made a perfect scenario for one of these cliché romantic novels with which the libraries are overflowing. The originality of Jane Austen's concept lies in the point of view, that uses Elizabeth Bennet as the main character. While Jane's story is still present, it is seen mostly from her sister's eyes, which makes it more interesting. However, it also makes it appear secondary. The major place is taken by Elizabeth's thoughts about her family, her regards in respect to some characters and her dislike toward some others. Furthermore, in the second half of the novel, her rather uncommon story with Mr. Darcy becomes the main center of interest. This hatred gradually turning into love is a great change compared to the usual "love at first sight" fairy tale.
Then, another element that is essential in the story, for it makes it realistic and funny, are the characters. Each character has a distinct personality that contributes to make the story more interesting. From Mrs. Bennet's garrulity and foolishness to her husband's cynicism, with Jane's infinite kindness, Lizzy's explosive character, Darcy's pride and Collins' ridiculousness, the mix can be nothing but delightful. Moreover, the pride and insolence of the characters of higher class show a profound critique of society. They consider the people of lower rank as savages and have no remorse when they openly criticize them. The "savages", on their side, are willing to do anything to increase their fortune, as to marry someone for whom they have no respect. For example, Mrs. Bennet wants Elizabeth to marry Mr. Collins, and Charlotte actually does marry him, for the sake of money. It is so fair to say that the characters are extremely realistic and represent with an outstanding precision the society of that time.
In conclusion, I must say Pride and Prejudice is one of the best novels I have read. Smart and funny, yet touching, it has everything it needs to please almost any kind of reader. Jane Austen's masterpiece will forever remain a classic of English literature.
First, it is important to mention the particular point of view. In any novel of this kind, the main character would, without any doubt, have been Jane, Elizabeth's older sister. The most classical love story between her and Mr. Bingley would have made a perfect scenario for one of these cliché romantic novels with which the libraries are overflowing. The originality of Jane Austen's concept lies in the point of view, that uses Elizabeth Bennet as the main character. While Jane's story is still present, it is seen mostly from her sister's eyes, which makes it more interesting. However, it also makes it appear secondary. The major place is taken by Elizabeth's thoughts about her family, her regards in respect to some characters and her dislike toward some others. Furthermore, in the second half of the novel, her rather uncommon story with Mr. Darcy becomes the main center of interest. This hatred gradually turning into love is a great change compared to the usual "love at first sight" fairy tale.
Then, another element that is essential in the story, for it makes it realistic and funny, are the characters. Each character has a distinct personality that contributes to make the story more interesting. From Mrs. Bennet's garrulity and foolishness to her husband's cynicism, with Jane's infinite kindness, Lizzy's explosive character, Darcy's pride and Collins' ridiculousness, the mix can be nothing but delightful. Moreover, the pride and insolence of the characters of higher class show a profound critique of society. They consider the people of lower rank as savages and have no remorse when they openly criticize them. The "savages", on their side, are willing to do anything to increase their fortune, as to marry someone for whom they have no respect. For example, Mrs. Bennet wants Elizabeth to marry Mr. Collins, and Charlotte actually does marry him, for the sake of money. It is so fair to say that the characters are extremely realistic and represent with an outstanding precision the society of that time.
In conclusion, I must say Pride and Prejudice is one of the best novels I have read. Smart and funny, yet touching, it has everything it needs to please almost any kind of reader. Jane Austen's masterpiece will forever remain a classic of English literature.
Friday, November 13, 2009
Inherit the Wind
1. How does Howard and Melinda's interaction at the beginning of the play foreshadow the major issues of the play? ------
2. What does Meeker, the bailiff's, willingness to let Cates out of jail to meet with Rachel tell us both about his offence and the town?
It tells that the offence is not serious and not a physical threat to the people.
3. What kind of town does Hillsboro seem to be in its preparation for Brady's arrival?
The town is really religious and shows it by singing.
4. What does Brady's relationship with his wife tell us about his character?
His relationship shows dependance and insecurity.
5. What does Brady's conversation with Rachel, and subsequent behaviour tell us about his character?
It tells us that he can be matipulative and cunning, and perharps even hypocritical.
6. How is Drummond characterized by the townspeople? Later when we meet him do they seem to be correct?
Drummond is described as evil because he defends criminals and murderers; however, the townspeople realize he is actually very decent.
7. What role does Hornbeck play in the action of the play? What is the significance of the way he speaks?
8. Do the elements of the trial seem fair to you? Why or why not?
9. What do you think Rachel’s motivations for asking Cates to drop the trial and admit
his guilt stem from?
10. What does Brady’s intervention in Reverend Brown’s sermon say about him? Does
this contradict what you thought about him as a character?
11. What is the central issue that Drummond is arguing for in the courtroom?
12. Do you think it is fair that none of Drummond’s expert witnesses are allowed to act as
witnesses?
13. What is it that Brady reveals about his religious beliefs while he is being questioned
in court by Drummond?
14. How does Drummond win over the support of the audience in the courtroom in his
examination of Brady?
15. What is it that Drummond says about progress? How is this significant to the play’s
main message?
16. How does Brady react to the courtroom’s support of Drummond instead of him?
17. What is the significance of Drummond’s story about Golden Dancer?
18. What is the difference in the way the two lawyers, Brady and Drummond respond to
the radio?
19. Why is Cates sentenced the way he is?
20. What is Cates’ statement after the verdict?
21. What happens to Brady after the trial? Was this a surprise?
22. What does Rachel decide at the end of the play? How does this tie into Drummond’s
message as well as the main theme of the play?
23. What does Drummond say Brady had the right to do or have?
24. What is the significance of the two books Drummond holds at the end of the play?
25. What do you think the main message of the play is?
2. What does Meeker, the bailiff's, willingness to let Cates out of jail to meet with Rachel tell us both about his offence and the town?
It tells that the offence is not serious and not a physical threat to the people.
3. What kind of town does Hillsboro seem to be in its preparation for Brady's arrival?
The town is really religious and shows it by singing.
4. What does Brady's relationship with his wife tell us about his character?
His relationship shows dependance and insecurity.
5. What does Brady's conversation with Rachel, and subsequent behaviour tell us about his character?
It tells us that he can be matipulative and cunning, and perharps even hypocritical.
6. How is Drummond characterized by the townspeople? Later when we meet him do they seem to be correct?
Drummond is described as evil because he defends criminals and murderers; however, the townspeople realize he is actually very decent.
7. What role does Hornbeck play in the action of the play? What is the significance of the way he speaks?
8. Do the elements of the trial seem fair to you? Why or why not?
9. What do you think Rachel’s motivations for asking Cates to drop the trial and admit
his guilt stem from?
10. What does Brady’s intervention in Reverend Brown’s sermon say about him? Does
this contradict what you thought about him as a character?
11. What is the central issue that Drummond is arguing for in the courtroom?
12. Do you think it is fair that none of Drummond’s expert witnesses are allowed to act as
witnesses?
13. What is it that Brady reveals about his religious beliefs while he is being questioned
in court by Drummond?
14. How does Drummond win over the support of the audience in the courtroom in his
examination of Brady?
15. What is it that Drummond says about progress? How is this significant to the play’s
main message?
16. How does Brady react to the courtroom’s support of Drummond instead of him?
17. What is the significance of Drummond’s story about Golden Dancer?
18. What is the difference in the way the two lawyers, Brady and Drummond respond to
the radio?
19. Why is Cates sentenced the way he is?
20. What is Cates’ statement after the verdict?
21. What happens to Brady after the trial? Was this a surprise?
22. What does Rachel decide at the end of the play? How does this tie into Drummond’s
message as well as the main theme of the play?
23. What does Drummond say Brady had the right to do or have?
24. What is the significance of the two books Drummond holds at the end of the play?
25. What do you think the main message of the play is?
Friday, October 23, 2009
Hills Like White Elephants
Thesis statement: Setting and symbolism are used to discuss abortion.
The setting introduces the tense atmosphere.
Spain, 1920's, The landscape contains imagery that evoke the characters' perspectives, Railstation / Rails in the sun, Important decision, Girl talks about the hills, White elephants (unique and uncommon)
The setting introduces the tense atmosphere.
Spain, 1920's, The landscape contains imagery that evoke the characters' perspectives, Railstation / Rails in the sun, Important decision, Girl talks about the hills, White elephants (unique and uncommon)
Friday, October 9, 2009
Mid-Term Writing Test
1. What is Louise Mallard’s opinion of marriage? Indicate the paragraph that suggests it?
Mrs. Mallard feels like she cannot live her life to the fullest because of marriage. She thinks her husband is controlling, and that being married means having to follow his will. It is clearly expressed in the text when the woman thinks, "there would be no powerful will bending hers in that blind persistence with which men and woman believe they have right to impose a private will upon a fellow-creature. A kind intention or a cruel intention made the act seem no less a crime as she looked upon it in that brief moment of illumination."
3. How does she feel about her future as a widow? Cite the line in the text, using just the first few words, then a series of dots …?
She realized that "she would live for herself. There would be no powerful will bending hers (...)", and that makes her extremely happy. She is impatient of starting her new life; a life in which she is free of living her own way. In other words, she welcomes the idea of this future.
6. Why did the author make the story so short?
The story is short because all the psychological evolution of the main character happens within one hour. From the moment she is told by her sister about her husband's death until she sees the latter enter the room, her feelings go gradually from deep sorrow to "the joy that kills". The fact that the story is so short shows that her psychological state evolves rapidly.
7. Explain how Louise can feel joy and sadness at the same time?
She feels joy in prevision of her new life as a free woman, but she is sad because of her husband's death. "She had loved him--sometimes", and it is always hard when someone you love dies; but she sees beyond that a great new life that will make her happy. "She knew that she would weep again when she saw the kind, tender hands folded in death. (...) But she saw beyond that bitter moment a long procession of years to come that would belong to her absolutely.
Irony in the story
In The Story of An Hour, Kate Chopin shows the readers how marriage and relationships can be ironic. First, there is irony in the fact that the woman who is told about her husband's death, after weeping in her sister's arms, actually starts feeling happy about the matter. When she goes away to her room, refusing to see anyone, she is feeling grief and "a physical exhaustion that haunted her body and seemed to reach into her soul". That is usually a normal reaction for a wife who loses her husband; however, she ends up welcoming her fate. These are two completely opposite reactions, and they both happen simultaneously. Being sad and happy at the same time, even if it is fairly possible, is very ironic; and being happy about the death of someone you love is even more ironic.
Then, another irony that is present in the story is the special kind of love between Mr. and Mrs. Mallard. They love each other, but she feels imprisoned in their relation. Kate Chopin even wrote: "And yet she had loved him--sometimes. Often she had not (...)", which expresses a certain irony. Mrs. Mallard is married to a man she doesn't always love, and she would prefer being alone and free. She obviously doesn't understand why she loves her husband, because she doesn't really like being with him. Yet, despite everything, the fact that she dies of "the joy that kills" means that she loved him; and even if she thought her new life would be great, she felt even happier when she saw him alive then when she realised she was free. In fact, love itself is a quite ironic phenomenon: people who are in love don't actually understand how they feel; and if one thinks he understand it, then it means he is not really in love.
Finally, the last irony I can find in The Story of An Hour is Mrs. Mallard's death. Her heart could not bear the prompt evolution of her feelings during this fatal hour, and it decided to give up. It is ironic that she died at the moment when her longing for life was the strongest. She felt alive, she had a hundred projects in mind, she was impatient to begin her new life as a widow. She had even just "breathed a quick prayer that life might be long". Unfortunately, her wish did not come true. As her joy was growing, it became so important that it ended up killing her. People usually die of intense sorrow, but not her: she died of extreme happiness. The irony of fate made her die of the most wonderful feeling in the world.
Mrs. Mallard feels like she cannot live her life to the fullest because of marriage. She thinks her husband is controlling, and that being married means having to follow his will. It is clearly expressed in the text when the woman thinks, "there would be no powerful will bending hers in that blind persistence with which men and woman believe they have right to impose a private will upon a fellow-creature. A kind intention or a cruel intention made the act seem no less a crime as she looked upon it in that brief moment of illumination."
3. How does she feel about her future as a widow? Cite the line in the text, using just the first few words, then a series of dots …?
She realized that "she would live for herself. There would be no powerful will bending hers (...)", and that makes her extremely happy. She is impatient of starting her new life; a life in which she is free of living her own way. In other words, she welcomes the idea of this future.
6. Why did the author make the story so short?
The story is short because all the psychological evolution of the main character happens within one hour. From the moment she is told by her sister about her husband's death until she sees the latter enter the room, her feelings go gradually from deep sorrow to "the joy that kills". The fact that the story is so short shows that her psychological state evolves rapidly.
7. Explain how Louise can feel joy and sadness at the same time?
She feels joy in prevision of her new life as a free woman, but she is sad because of her husband's death. "She had loved him--sometimes", and it is always hard when someone you love dies; but she sees beyond that a great new life that will make her happy. "She knew that she would weep again when she saw the kind, tender hands folded in death. (...) But she saw beyond that bitter moment a long procession of years to come that would belong to her absolutely.
Irony in the story
In The Story of An Hour, Kate Chopin shows the readers how marriage and relationships can be ironic. First, there is irony in the fact that the woman who is told about her husband's death, after weeping in her sister's arms, actually starts feeling happy about the matter. When she goes away to her room, refusing to see anyone, she is feeling grief and "a physical exhaustion that haunted her body and seemed to reach into her soul". That is usually a normal reaction for a wife who loses her husband; however, she ends up welcoming her fate. These are two completely opposite reactions, and they both happen simultaneously. Being sad and happy at the same time, even if it is fairly possible, is very ironic; and being happy about the death of someone you love is even more ironic.
Then, another irony that is present in the story is the special kind of love between Mr. and Mrs. Mallard. They love each other, but she feels imprisoned in their relation. Kate Chopin even wrote: "And yet she had loved him--sometimes. Often she had not (...)", which expresses a certain irony. Mrs. Mallard is married to a man she doesn't always love, and she would prefer being alone and free. She obviously doesn't understand why she loves her husband, because she doesn't really like being with him. Yet, despite everything, the fact that she dies of "the joy that kills" means that she loved him; and even if she thought her new life would be great, she felt even happier when she saw him alive then when she realised she was free. In fact, love itself is a quite ironic phenomenon: people who are in love don't actually understand how they feel; and if one thinks he understand it, then it means he is not really in love.
Finally, the last irony I can find in The Story of An Hour is Mrs. Mallard's death. Her heart could not bear the prompt evolution of her feelings during this fatal hour, and it decided to give up. It is ironic that she died at the moment when her longing for life was the strongest. She felt alive, she had a hundred projects in mind, she was impatient to begin her new life as a widow. She had even just "breathed a quick prayer that life might be long". Unfortunately, her wish did not come true. As her joy was growing, it became so important that it ended up killing her. People usually die of intense sorrow, but not her: she died of extreme happiness. The irony of fate made her die of the most wonderful feeling in the world.
Thursday, October 8, 2009
Sentence combining
1. Independant coordinate clauses
Two sentences may be connected by a coordinate conjunction or a conjunctive adverb.
- Addition: and (CC), moreover (CA)
- Result: so (CC), therefore (CA)
- Contrast: but (CC), however (CA)
2. Dependent subordinate clauses
Dependent clauses contain subjects and predicates with full verbs. These clauses function as adverbs, nouns, and adjectives.
Conjunctions:
- Cause: because, since, as
- Contrast: although, even though, though, while, whereas
- Condition: if, unless, whether, even if
- Time: before, after, when, until, since, while
Two sentences may be connected by a coordinate conjunction or a conjunctive adverb.
- Addition: and (CC), moreover (CA)
- Result: so (CC), therefore (CA)
- Contrast: but (CC), however (CA)
2. Dependent subordinate clauses
Dependent clauses contain subjects and predicates with full verbs. These clauses function as adverbs, nouns, and adjectives.
Conjunctions:
- Cause: because, since, as
- Contrast: although, even though, though, while, whereas
- Condition: if, unless, whether, even if
- Time: before, after, when, until, since, while
Tuesday, October 6, 2009
LEL 2: Vocabulary and Spelling 1: Strategies for Complex Words
1. Interest level
This course wasn't really interesting because it was only about the meaning of some vocabulary words. It was almost like reading a dictionary.
2. Difficulty
This course was really easy for me, because many of the vocabulary words were French words used in English, so I already knew their meaning. Even most of the English words were simple words.
3. What I learned
The only new word I learned is the verb "to slough", which means "to ignore".
4. My score: 99/100
5. Course rating: 4/10
I think the course isn't really relevant for anyway who has a minimum of vocabulary. However, people who are not used to more complicated words and English people who don't know the meaning of French words might find it more interesting than me.
This course wasn't really interesting because it was only about the meaning of some vocabulary words. It was almost like reading a dictionary.
2. Difficulty
This course was really easy for me, because many of the vocabulary words were French words used in English, so I already knew their meaning. Even most of the English words were simple words.
3. What I learned
The only new word I learned is the verb "to slough", which means "to ignore".
4. My score: 99/100
5. Course rating: 4/10
I think the course isn't really relevant for anyway who has a minimum of vocabulary. However, people who are not used to more complicated words and English people who don't know the meaning of French words might find it more interesting than me.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
